I realize that it is in part my snotty hipsterism that makes me sneer at golf, and the trappings of golf, like pesticide-drenched botanical monocultures with incredibly ugly subdivisions built around them, filled with McMansions and streets named after the wildlife that used to live there before some jerk-face developer caught up in the subprime mortgage orgy brought in the bulldozers.
Yes, filming instructional golf videos has now joined racing mutant pigeons in the big book of things people think are worth a hawk’s life. Tripp Isenhour, a small-time golf pro with a big-time sense of privilege, was apparently irritated by the Red-shouldered Hawk’s repeated vocalizations as he filmed in Florida in December. So he hit several balls at the bird, the last of which struck it in the head and killed it.
Isenhour claims that this was an accident, the result of a “one in a million” shot, and that he was just trying to scare the bird away. Members of his film crew, however, tell a different story, saying that he persisted in harassing the hawk after it became apparent that it wasn’t going to be scared off by a golf ball, deliberately hitting shots closer and closer to it.
The bird was buried off the fairway by a production assistant, but Isenhour’s sound engineer, haunted by bad dreams about the incident, later reported it to the authorities.
Frankly, I haven’t got much sympathy for the “accident” claim; hassling wildlife over something so trivial, in a way that has an inherent risk of injury to the animal, is in and of itself bad enough for me to condemn.
March 13, 2008 at 10:53 am
What annoys me about golf is that it requires a huge area for the pleasure of a few.
If you build a public swimming pool or even a fricking indoor skiing resort, you can entertain a whole bunch of people on a relatively small area. But I think it is quite selfish of golfers to occupy hundreds of acres for a hobby that might entertain – say – just 50 people or less a day on that area.
I sometimes wondered if the same strategy would work with birders.
Let’s say I am willing and able to invest a million or two and want to increase my income. I could buy some land and turn it into a golf course or alternatively turn the same strip of land into a birding area by providing ponds and prairies and hedgerows with a system of birding trails and blinds, and make a profit by charging a small entrance fee.
But then again, would you trust that a vagrant spotted on that lot was genuine or presume it was released there to increase the profit through cashing in on all the listers?
March 14, 2008 at 4:04 pm
Ignorance + entitlement = dead hawks
I believe the math here is quite clear.
March 14, 2008 at 4:20 pm
I was going to reply, but we can’t take over the comments section again! We might get banned for … well … blog stalking or something!